To if approaching the relations between ‘ ‘ trabalho’ ‘ ‘ ‘ educao’ ‘ , it is perceived necessity of contextualizar such slight knowledge. For being different concepts one of the other and at the same time for becoming related enters itself, has it importance of if defining what he is ‘ ‘ trabalho’ ‘ what he is ‘ ‘ educao’ ‘. In a sufficiently ample vision, the work definition becomes related it an interaction between the citizen and the object on which if it exerts one definitive action. Health organizations spoke with conviction. (MARX, 1985). Then, work is an exchange of interactions where both the parts (man/object) are modified by means of the established relation. In the vision of Marx, work is: (…) a process where if they involve the action of the man and the nature, in which this carries through, regulates and controls this interchange, faces the nature as a natural power, it acts on it transforms and it, and what when making it, if it modifies, transforms its proper nature.
(MARX, 1971, apud AXE, 2005, P. 130). Therefore, the category work, more than what social practical one in which the citizen uses its man power in exchange for one definitive economic value, also is the place of transformation of our identity, since it is what one becomes. Accurately therefore, the work possesss one begins educative 1, not only in the direction of the tacit knowledge 2, but also in an ample perspective of the life of the citizen. Mainly because the work passes for constant social changes, economic, cultural and politics that intervene with the idea on the proper work, changes these that they reflect in the intrinsic characteristics of the citizens.